Dilma igen

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

BRASIL-SUÉCIA Nummer 260, den 2 maj 2016, årgång 20

Redaktör: Lennart Kjörling

Om kultur, politik och sociala frågor, i Brasilien, Sverige, Afrika, ja hela världen

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
På första maj demonstrerade brassar i Sverige mot kuppen i Brasilien. Underst en längre text om kuppen. Jag vill lyfta fram två saker. Redan nu börjar den nya planerade regeringen, där många är korruptionsanklagade att diskutera hur man kan försvaga korruptionsbekämpningen i Lava Jato. Bottennappet var den deputado som hyllade en av de värsta torterarna när han förklarade varför han ville straffa Dilma. Dilma som led under just den tortyren

I allt mitt försvar för regeringen vill jag ändå lyfta fram två kritiska punkter

1 En vänsterkritik. PT har under sin tid vid makten alltmer litat på samma metoder som tidigare regeringar. Man har sökt stöd och resurser för den egna apparaten hos företag istället för att lita på de egna medlemmarna och istället för att reformera den politiska strukturen

2 En högerkritik, kanske. Det som fällt regeringen är den ekonomiska utvecklingen, där finns utrymme för ett folkligt missnöje. Vänstern har inte alltid velat diskuterar detta mer grundligt utan hamnar lätt i enkla fraser om att bekämpa högern.

Texten under finns på http://interc.pt/1Tnb4lG The Intercept

IT’S NOT EASY for outsiders to sort through all the competing claims about Brazil’s political crisis and the ongoing effort to oust its president, Dilma Rousseff, who won re-election a mere 18 months ago with 54 million votes. But the most important means for understanding the truly anti-democratic nature of what’s taking place is to look at the person whom Brazilian oligarchs and their media organs are trying to install as president: the corruption-tainted, deeply unpopular, oligarch-serving Vice President Michel Temer (above). Doing so shines a bright light on what’s really going on, and why the world should be deeply disturbed.

The New York Times’s Brazil bureau chief, Simon Romero, interviewed Temer this week, and this is how his excellent article begins:

RIO DE JANEIRO — One recent poll found that only 2 percent of Brazilians would vote for him. He is under scrutiny over testimony linking him to a colossal graft scandal. And a high court justice ruled that Congress should consider impeachment proceedings against him.

Michel Temer, Brazil’s vice president, is preparing to take the helm of Brazil next month if the Senate decides to put President Dilma Rousseff on trial.

How can anyone rational believe that anti-corruption anger is driving the elite effort to remove Dilma when they are now installing someone as president who is accused of corruption far more serious than she is? It’s an obvious farce. But there’s something even worse.

House Speaker Eduardo Cunha.

Photo: Dida Sampaio/Estadao via AP

The person who is third in line to the presidency, right behind Temer, has been exposed as shamelessly corrupt: the evangelical zealot and House speaker Eduardo Cunha. He’s the one who spearheaded the impeachment proceedings even though he got caught last year squirreling away millions of dollars in bribes in Swiss bank accounts, after having lied to Congress when falsely denying that he had any accounts in foreign banks. When Romero asked Temer about his posture toward Cunha once he takes power, this is how Temer responded:

Mr. Temer defended himself and top allies who are under a cloud of accusations in the scheme. He expressed support for Eduardo Cunha, the scandal-plagued speaker of the lower house who is leading the impeachment effort in Congress, saying he would not ask Mr. Cunha to resign. Mr. Cunha will be the next in line for the presidency if Mr. Temer takes over.

By itself, this demonstrates the massive scam taking place here. As my partner, David Miranda, wrote this morning in his Guardian op-ed: “It has now become clear that corruption is not the cause of the effort to oust Brazil’s twice-elected president; rather, corruption is merely the pretext.” In response, Brazil’s media elites will claim (as Temer did) that once Dilma is impeached, then the other corrupt politicians will most certainly be held accountable, but they know this is false, and Temer’s shocking support for Cunha makes that clear. Indeed, press reports show that Temer is planning to install as attorney general — the key government contact for the corruption investigation — a politician specifically urged for that position by Cunha. As Miranda’s op-ed explains, “The real plan behind Rousseff’s impeachment is to put an end to the ongoing investigation, thus protecting corruption, not punishing it.”

But there’s one more vital motive driving all of this. Look at who is going to take over Brazil’s economy and finances once Dilma’s election victory is nullified. Two weeks ago, Reuters reported that Temer’s leading choice to run the central bank is the chair of Goldman Sachs in Brazil, Paulo Leme. Today, Reuters reported that “Murilo Portugal, the head of Brazil’s most powerful banking industry lobby” — and a long-time IMF official — “has emerged as a strong candidate to become finance minister if Temer takes power.” Temer also vowed that he would embrace austerity for Brazil’s already-suffering population: He “intends to downsize the government” and “slash spending.”